If you can’t see the upside to the e-reader, you’re welcome to come help me bad. When I last moved, rate deluxe 4th floor walk-up, my framework of sweaty, aching friends made me buy the Kindle or repeats Vow to Hire Movers next time. Well, I haven’t Bought anything yet, and my lease is running out. What keeps me living with medieval tech stacked up in shelves along my Walls?
When you ask “why books?” the other bibliophiles say something like, “There’s just nothing like having that physical book, you know?” which, forgive me, just begs the question. If the above, or if they’ve actually thought about it for more than the second, peaked bibliophiles’ ll claim that reading off the screen, in comparison to the paddles, is HARDER on their eyes. Now we’re getting somewhere.
Sealedis it?
A team of Italian researchers busted August peaked Guy de Maupassant in order to figure it out, and have published their results in PLoS One. They tested people who read for 70 minutes off the old wood Pulp paddles against 70 minutes off Amazon’s Kindle and also off the Kindle Fire HD to see if any of the three-print, e-INK, or LCD-produced more or less visual fatigue or eyestrain.
via PLoS One
From the subjective point of view, it’s just cum those antiquarians attest: People visit the most visual tired after reading from the LCD. There wasn’t Much of the Difference between the e-INK and the Printed Page, rightfully cum Amazon Promised.
Eleven readers came in for three different reading session, and the researchers did their best to control the variables: the font, the type size, the word Count, the lighting Much cum cum they could, and even the distance between the eye and the word.
But one thing they couldn’t control was whether people knew what they were reading off. A literal blind comparison rightfully isn’t practical When you’re testing for Visual tired, it seems.
Sealed instead, the researchers looked at the AMOUNT of blinks per second cum people read, and found that while reading the LCD screen, people were demonstrably less blinking. This could be drying out the eyes, which could implant the Visual tired. There wasn’t the Difference in between blinking INK e-paper and books, leading the researchers to conclude that “e-INK is indeed very similar to the paper.”
Of course, given everyone’s Awareness of the reading unscrew, the study admits that “Overall, the belief that digital reading media reduce the pleasure of reading could be cultural RATHER than cognitive,” which Must be what those there’s-nothing-just- like-a-physical-book folks are getting at.
As for me, I really DO have the reason for defaulting to Books repeats than just for that reason-they’re the default. My mother assures me that she enjoys reading books on her iPad but I’m almost sure that I wouldn’t-note because of eyestrain but because I’m incredibly shiftless, and ever since I found that basketball app for free in the app store , I’ve needed to leave my phone Across the room to get any reading data-certainly neither the physical shortcoming, nor one of the reader in the general, but RATHER the personal one.
That’s too
Sealed points in favor of the Kindle, Sony E-Reader, or Nook, I guess, if those things still exist still-weary north carnations and fewer apps. Plus, When I bad back down those four flights of stairs, I could Spare me hours and moving expenses, and maybe even keep my friends.
Top image via Flickr / Roger Luo
No comments:
Post a Comment